Namasthe, Indiaunited is a community that supports manual curation on Hive Blockchain. We manually curate posts every day from several users. People can delegate their Hive Power to the Indiaunited community and get a 100% share of the Curation rewards earned by the community account. In addition to that, people can also delegate their Leo Power to @india-leo account and earn 100% curation reward share. The reward share will be based on the amount of LEO delegated by an individual. The delegators will receive their curation reward share once every day. This post is to show the curation rewards earned by @india-leo account in the last 7 days and also the list of current delegators and their rewards in the last one week. If you have any questions, you can reach out to us on our discord.
Even though the curation reward curve is flat and we vote only posts that are less than 24 hours old, the rewards can be variable. It can differ from one day to another. That is why is best to take an average for a week and compare. The rewards are also automatically claimed on Hive Engine and that creates a possibility where the rewards gets claimed two times on the same dates. But overall if we look at the data for multiple days in a row, it will be good.
Delegators earning report
Below is the list of delegators who are currently delegating to the community and earning daily reward shares. Below report is a consolidated report so that every delegator can see how much they are earning every week in total from their delegation and their average earning per day.
| SNo | Delegator | Total LEO | Total Rewards (per Week) | Average Rewards (per Day) | APR | Delegation Created | Delegation Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | @codingdefined | 20102.238 | 1.610 | 0.230 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 4 months ago |
| 2 | @bala-leo | 15000.000 | 1.201 | 0.172 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 9 months ago |
| 3 | @notak | 6000 | 0.481 | 0.069 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 4 | @bala41288 | 4209.539 | 0.337 | 0.048 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 5 months ago |
| 5 | @hoosie | 3506.824 | 0.281 | 0.040 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 6 | @quinnertronics | 2515.241 | 0.201 | 0.029 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | a year ago |
| 7 | @davidesimoncini | 2487.717 | 0.199 | 0.028 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 5 months ago |
| 8 | @ultratrain | 1731.653 | 0.139 | 0.020 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 8 days ago |
| 9 | @riandeuk | 1206.830 | 0.097 | 0.014 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | a year ago |
| 10 | @namelessnameless | 976.435 | 0.078 | 0.011 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 11 | @cryptokim03 | 923.951 | 0.074 | 0.011 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 3 months ago |
| 12 | @vocup | 800.000 | 0.064 | 0.009 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 3 months ago |
| 13 | @stevenson7 | 715.413 | 0.057 | 0.008 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 14 | @oivas | 590.090 | 0.047 | 0.007 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 10 months ago |
| 15 | @funshee | 537.920 | 0.043 | 0.006 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 6 months ago |
| 16 | @imfarhad | 501.000 | 0.040 | 0.006 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 5 months ago |
| 17 | @successchar | 500.000 | 0.040 | 0.006 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 2 months ago |
| 18 | @jane1289 | 500.000 | 0.040 | 0.006 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 19 | @catharsis | 460.000 | 0.037 | 0.005 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 20 | @uakulinar | 453.507 | 0.036 | 0.005 | 0.41 | 3 years ago | 4 months ago |
| 21 | @balvinder294 | 400 | 0.032 | 0.005 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 22 | @bitandi | 350.000 | 0.028 | 0.004 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 10 months ago |
| 23 | @idea-make-rich | 313.672 | 0.025 | 0.004 | 0.42 | 4 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 24 | @azriella | 300.000 | 0.024 | 0.003 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 25 | @blog-beginner | 296.000 | 0.024 | 0.003 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 26 | @netherhawk | 260.000 | 0.021 | 0.003 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 27 | @shrazi | 249.106 | 0.020 | 0.003 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 28 | @consciouscat | 243.005 | 0.019 | 0.003 | 0.41 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 29 | @myothuzar | 229.334 | 0.018 | 0.003 | 0.41 | 4 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 30 | @ana-maria | 200.000 | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 31 | @akdx | 200 | 0.016 | 0.002 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 32 | @inuke | 154.112 | 0.012 | 0.002 | 0.41 | 4 years ago | 5 months ago |
| 33 | @n1hal | 140.000 | 0.011 | 0.002 | 0.41 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 34 | @blkchn | 125.000 | 0.010 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 4 months ago |
| 35 | @aniol77 | 110.182 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.43 | 3 years ago | a year ago |
| 36 | @thetimetravelerz | 100.000 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 37 | @quetz | 100 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 38 | @svanbo | 98.798 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 39 | @ivyann | 94.700 | 0.008 | 0.001 | 0.44 | 6 months ago | 4 months ago |
| 40 | @hotwing | 81.091 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.39 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 41 | @zullyscott | 80.219 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.39 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 42 | @sayee | 79.946 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.39 | 4 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 43 | @namok | 63.678 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.41 | 3 years ago | 10 months ago |
| 44 | @ekads | 50.000 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.42 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 45 | @hellene8 | 45.000 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.46 | 2 years ago | a year ago |
| 46 | @moneykeep | 18 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.29 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 47 | @oasiskp2 | 10.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.52 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 48 | @vangie | 10.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.52 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 49 | @kalibudz23 | 1.484 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 2 years ago | 2 years ago |
| 50 | @kitsuki | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
| 51 | @jaybart | 0.185 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 3 years ago | 3 years ago |
We have the above list of members delegating their LEO to our @india-leo account. If you don't want yourself to be tagged in any of the future posts, please let us know in the comments.
Note: The above list will include only the current active delegation to the account at the moment the report is prepared. If someone had withdrawn their delegation somewhere before the report is prepared, it will not be included in the report. Additionally please also note that for some people the APR value would be a little different either more or less. This means they would have recently updated their delegation. Otherwise, the APR is close to 9% and there will be a slight variation based on the price of LEO.
This post is an automated post. If you find any discrepancies or have any questions please reach out to us on the discord server.
Congratulations @indiaunited! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)
Your next target is to reach 500 posts.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPI've asked you many times to reconsider these layer 2 token delegation reports and accepting rewards for them, as well as
"HP delegators and IUC token holders also get upto 20% additional vote weight."
delegating shouldn't get people higher votes, that's bribery and benefits yourself.
Delegating alone doesn't directly give people higher votes. Only if people are manually curated, they get a higher vote. If that's your problem, we can get that additional perk removed from the curation. We know about your contributions in POSH, engagement, and curation efforts. It is not that your curators alone do a selfless job; we have a similar set of curators in our community as well, doing selfless jobs. At least you pay them from the reward pool through some mechanism. We don't even do that.
We don't understand how 2 is many. This is the second time you are mentioning this as a problem, and that too with proper words. So far, the message was only conveyed through downvotes, which is why the message was not clear to the community. If LEO or any Layer 2 token update is your issue, and the weekly $1-$2 earnings from that post are your concern, then we can definitely stop posting that content. The small reward we earned on those posts helped us pay the server bills.
In the future, it will be nice and helpful if communications with the community or some representatives of the community are made before directly attacking them. We are not your enemies, and we don't have to attack each other. We have also been here for over 7 years on this chain and are trying our puny efforts for community building.
You may be doing big, big things for Hive, but we are a very small community trying to build with our small capacity. The market is already reducing the motivation for many people, and if elephants keep stamping on the small ants who are trying to build a small colony, the remaining motivation will also be gone. We don't need support from elephants, which we never had; it will be helpful at least if the stamping is not happening. Thanks for understanding.
If these things are left unchecked and properly not conveyed how serious of an issue they are, they'll grow uncontrollably all over the ecosystem to continously damage it. If it's not too much rewards then please don't accept them on such posts, it's easy to forfeit them through beneficiaries.
Manual curators being picky about who gets bigger upvotes based on self-interest is the same as autovoting people if they're delegating your way or holding some tokens of yours. Using layer 1 curation to prop up the value of layer 2 tokens is against hive curation, I know you're not excessive in that regard but it's still unfair towards other curation projects and stakeholders that focus on everything else that should be important in curation rather than self-interest.
Thanks for the detailed explanation, but as mentioned in the previous comment, we are okay to remove the additional perk we were giving. We will adjust our curation bot accordingly.
Would you be kind enough to remove the downvote from our contest post? As you can see, we have a good engagement on that post, and many people are participating. Even though nobody is supporting such efforts, the creator of the contest himself is spending some Hive from his pocket to reward the winners. We also use the community account to manually reward some of the contest posts.
Edit: Looks like the contest post was already paid out.
If you're worried about income to keep maintaining and hosting things just take a cut from delegations. Why would you deserve to collect author rewards for that to outcompete others in terms of returns.
You see how sleezy most of your practices are, right?