I know this is just a simple exercise and doing what I'm thinking is probably a lot more work, but it would be interesting over a 10 year period which way you'd come out better if you sold all your cub and reinvested in said pools.
For instance, sold all your cub once a month and reinvested ins table pools, or sold half your cub and reinvested in the cub stable pool, assuming every 4 years cub set a new high and then crashed back down during the bear market. I would assume stables may perform better, but that just depends (I would think) how high cub value went each bull market.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
I guess that's what I'm interested in, what's the performance after 5 or even 10 years!
I'm sure it can't be that difficult to make a little model based on historical prices.
Could be a depressing look back!
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta