Even when they vote widely now, they are criticized for not being wide enough and much of what they vote on might not be personally of interest to them.
They are in the minority though so blanket changing things across the board with the whales in mind doesn't work for me. It's an interesting dilemma though.
If I was in their position I'm not sure what I'd do. That's a whole different ball game and I can see how dollar amounts start to matter more here.
Maybe there should be a maximum vote value for any one person to receive and some more creative uses for excess VP. Just thinking outloud here . . . 😂
!ENGAGE 20
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
This isn't a blanket change for the whales. It seems that small accounts are far less wide than many seem to believe. The whales are probably among the widest now. My point is, this is a dpos platform, so stake matters.
There were many complaints when the whales voted on the hbd stabiliser, which effectively took something like 3 million Hive out of circulation.
No change is ever going to make everyone happy.
True that! 😁
I'll just keep on doing what I'm doing, grateful for the increase in curation rewards.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
As long as we are moving toward a general better incentive model for improved behavior, I am okay with experimenting and the odd failure.