I agree. But less clicks (pageviews), less ad revenue. The question is what users prefer and if they think at ad revenue when they use the platform. Because if they do, then they won't mind going through more hoops for more ad revenue. If they don't, that keeps them away from using certain features.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That begs the question of whether we are looking at INLEO as a social content experience, or just a glorified "cash dispenser..."
Good point! I understand the desire of stakeholders (I am one of them, after all) and content creators to increase their earnings sustainably, but at the same time the UX must be the priority, or users (stakeholders or not) will eventually get tired. Seeing this activity as building a business only works for some, as in real life. But the vast majority don't have this mentality and probably never will. Maybe future generations. And a social media website needs the vast majority for activity.
It'll be very interesting to follow how it unfolds, to be sure... particularly in light of the way Web 3.0 is often touted as an environment in which we are all — in essence — "Business Me."
Basically, Web 3 is still searching itself, with few things well defined and maybe not even a clear image of what is desired to be accomplished.
I would look at it as a social content and how to improve that.
I fee that is where the real value comes from.
Sure. but the question was not about ad revenue the question is why do you feel comments/engagement is down.
Again, I agree. That means users prefer a simpler UX for seeing comments, even if it hurts the ad revenue (or maybe they don't care about the ad revenue at all).