@lucidlucrecia, we noticed that @hivewatchers has targeted you. You do not have to verify your identity for anyone. They are a destructive force controlled by one person on the blockchain, who harasses more good users than they keep away bad ones, but I encourage you to keep participating. Your energy and engagement keeps things alive here. Do not give up! #freecompliments
I love her activeness here. I'm not sure about what the HW spotted.
In all honesty, to clear things, if actually she owns the content she shares, blogs or whatever HW spotted, she should be bold enough to claim ownership of what belongs to her, it's not difficult.
I hope she returns and gets active again.
Before I joined Hive, I heard it's about true ownership and against plagiarism and I think that is safe for the people who genuinely create original content and have it saved on the blockchain.
I remember a post a hiver shared and it was not an original content but was taken verbatim from a site and the creator claimed in the comments to his commenters about the experience shared in the blog post which is not right. This can destroy the trust built.
It's okay to get ideas from an AI and work on it and not copy word for word, share it and claim ownership.
My honest opinion. I hope she gets active again. 🧡
#freecompliments
Absolutely, I actually made it very clear that one of the very few rules in the FC Community is "no plagiarism." Plagiarism is theft, which is not legal.
We'll see what happens. I'm still in the process of determining rewards for this month, and Lucrecia's are up in the air until this situation is cleared up a bit more.
That's right. It will be against what the FC Community is about when anyone practices it.
Alright, we need to do our best for the community.
Have a blessed Sunday.
#freecompliments
You do when you are reprinting content posted elsewhere first. No plagiarism and they'll never ask. So, that means they've found the content she shares elsewhere and she must prove ownership of it. I don't like HW, but agree with this.
Guilty until proven innocent? Why is it up to her to prove the content is hers vs. hivewatchers responsibility to prove that it isn't before targeting her? You don't need permission to post your content to 1,000 different places if you want
Hive has rules created by the community years ago. 2 get paid u need 2 post it here 1st. If it comes in2 question then it's up 2 you 2 prove it's yours 2 earn from it. You can post whatever you want, but u don't have a right 2 earn from it
I think you mean rules created by hivewatchers. You don't have "right" to earn from any post so that's kind of beside the point. Otherwise, if you could point me to a list of these community rules that would be awesome.
@freecompliments, I highly appreciate your stance and support for the #freecompliments community. A true leader dares to support the minnows. I am also grateful to @khaleelkazi for his supportive gesture, and I feel proud to be a part of the community, which is genuinely a Web 3.0 and purely community-driven platform.
As far as the so-called HW is concerned, you can take away the rewards and do that with pleasure, but you are not an honest individual. You should be ashamed that you are destroying the people away from the so-called decentralized blockchain, where the people with some stack can manipulate and decide whatever they feel is right or good.
FYI, how you analyze content is sheer mockery and ridiculous. Any content would be considered AI-generated, especially those who understand the languages pretty well, like any philosophical written content if being put in whatever Ai-detector (I don't know which one is their favorite these days) that would be highlighted as AI-generated. The popular Ai-dtectors, like Zerogpt etc, are okay with it.
As far as Ai=generated art or images are concerned, I saw people on Inleo publishing it openly and daily, so I followed the lead and thought it was okay to do so.
To conclude, I am not interested in wasting my precious time and energy where bias, racist, and tunnel vision individuals rule with their illusions don't make sense to me. The world is significant, and we have a good enough number of kind and gentle people who have yet to comply and live happily.
I am grateful to the entire Inleo community for showing their love, support, and kindness to a newbie. I suggest the sooner, the better the Inleo be. Only Leo or morons are not letting your dreams come true. They'd drive away the new users by doing so. Inleo deserves to be a social media in its true essence.
Sidenote: Closing your eyes to the AI won't help; it's like barring the cryptocurrency for years, but it's all invaluable.
Blessings and Love to all.
I always do try to give people the benefit of the doubt. Sometimes I am wrong, other times not.
Just between myself and our curator, I'd appreciate your honesty about your usage of AI in posts (you can tell us privately, but our curation would ultimately reflect the community's wishes).
The AI content in threads I don't see as a problem... they're threads, for God's sake lol. People share such stuff on social media all the time. Just as long as you're the one creating the AI images, rather than lifting them from elsewhere and not attributing them.