Should be even more transparent with the planned front-end and leaderboard.
Nice!
I'd be interested to hear more about this delegation idea, not quite sure what you're referring to there
Instead of making the service free which might attract scripting to do attacks, add a "very small" (suggestion) Hive delegation to an account that you can use for curation. This avoids decentivizes attacks from multiple accounts as they would need to power delegate hive in addition, to use the command.
Then you can even say, that if you delegate 5 HP, you can do 1 command per day, 10 HP, 2 per day, etc... (can be other ratios, just exemplifying).
Obviously this can come later as now raising awareness is probably more important, I am guessing.
Hm I don't think we discussed making it free? I feel like the subscription model is beneficial in several ways, as it both adds utility to HBD and makes it less tempting for spammers/attackers to misuse it. But I'm definitely open to it being things that I haven't thought about yet.
The case of subscribers using scripts to spam the service is somethign I have thought about, and would likely require me to implement some sort of upper limit of daily allowed requests. I'm intriguged by the idea of such a system, but I'm also a bit afraid a system like this would make it unneccessarily complex to use the service
Ups, ignore the free part. I was confusing something in my head.
But on the other hand, it would be important to think about users in general and how confortable they feel with using inleo to pay for a service. Hence why I was referring to the delegation option, which can be also in LEO...
But just to explain, the use of delegations could be an option for longer periods of time as an "accumulator" of tokens that then can be spent by the user at his own leasure.
This in my view is a more attractive way of payment because of its trustless nature. But, obviously spending HBD is more attractive as a financial model to support a service.
Ah yes! This is not a bad idea. You got my mind going. Probably not gonna do this just right now, but definitely gonna keep in in mind for the future - either for this or something else.
Regarding not using INLEO to pay for the service. How about offering an alternative solution: Simply transfer 5 HBD to @ai-summaries, no memos or anything? In addition to the existing option that is.
That could be an option too, but I would recon the value would decrease, because your account itself has "an intrinsic" value to subscribe for. So, it would have to be lower... if right now.
Otherwise in the long term when inleo is already large enough and your service too, then I would say it might not matter anymore. It all depends of what you make about the "subscription" value of a specific account.
Not sure I understand the part about decrease value and intrinsic value. Do I understand correctly that you support the idea to offer an additional way to subscribe (directly transfer funds to ai-summaries), but that 5HBD is too high price? I'm still on the fence on the best way to proceed, that's why I keep asking. Highly appreciate all your input!
Hi, @mightpossibly,
This post has been voted on by @darkcloaks because you are an active member of the Darkcloaks gaming community.
Get started with Darkcloaks today, and follow us on Inleo for the latest updates.
What I mean with intrinsic value here, is the value you may offer/represent to other users by just things you post "privately" in your account and would require users to subscribe to you.