Cut PeakD and Ecency's guaranteed funding if the don't make money and you'll see innovation.
Right now safety (aka the slow grind to zero) is incentivised.
Hive is so backward.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Cut PeakD and Ecency's guaranteed funding if the don't make money and you'll see innovation.
Right now safety (aka the slow grind to zero) is incentivised.
Hive is so backward.
Agreed, we just a good alternative to the features on Peakd
I would even go for other features, why cannibalize the tiny user base between us, if each frontend can cater to =/ needs?
I've always seen Peakd as the home for hardcore users, Ecency for the lite users, Leo for the business oriented ones
The average human wants ease of access. I want to have a button on my frontpage to access whatever feature I want to use when I want to use it. I don't want to log into multiple interfaces to get what I want.
True on the ease of access, but will the average normie will ever care about governance or witnesses? They'll just proxy Leo to do that stuff for them (hence my peakd for hardcore users POV).
There's so many features on peakd and ecency that only a handful of users need, your average 2030 user will only want ease of access for some features, not every single feature. So why develop something that already exists
Instead of focusing on what doesn't exist.
What would you rather see Leo develop, a governance page or an SEO editor that checks your grammar, gives you tips, prompts you to add images, and rewrites some bullshit paragraph you made?
SEO tips would be cool, but the rest sounds like it will take the individual personality out of it. Also, rather than reinventing the wheel,make it easier to switch interfaces right from LEO and directly to the feature they are looking for
Who knows, all I know is that with a nice dev budget I'd try to innovate. So much out there that web2 does horribly or ultra centralized... focus on that sector, steal every user
I'd love more of that & less catering to the existing users