You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Happy Block 50M + Blurt Under Attack

in LeoFinance4 years ago

if I benefit 100 Steem per month from that myself is probably too much, so please stop over-inflating the 10% dlease profit, it is almost nothing.

It does not matter how much it is, even if it's 0.001 STEEM, you are still "deriving monetary value" from this project, and breaking the promise give to Steem stakeholders & community.

"As custodian of this project I, @thecryptodrive, will not derive any monetary value therefrom and undertake this under my duty as Steem consensus witness and ambassador."

I already proposed the solution in my post (Decentralizing Hive dApps: HBD Potato) and opened a pull request on Github, so you don't have to worry about not having devs to do it.


I am largely conflicted about sending them to the DAO

You received a lot of those funds from DAO, it should be returned.

I have considered alternatives like donating them to efforts like Curie or giving them out in Robin-hood style to nice people still within the community who support freedom and renounce tyranny.

They are NOT your funds, they were trusted to you by the Steem community with only one purpose: keeping the SBD peg. You can't just use them for something else.

While Blurt remains under attack I feel that I should steward these funds as security for the time being.

Funds in SBDPotato and HBDPotato have nothing to do with Blurt. Even if Blurt is attacked 24/7, they should be either used to keep the peg or returned to DAO.

Sort:  

HBD/SBD work, right?

So really this isn't necessary, right?

He's alright.

What's your fascination with attacking blurt anyhow?

lol, I'm not attacking blurt. I'm just saying blurt and HBD/SBD potato are completely separated projects, so funds shouldn't be used for something else just because blurt is attacked.

I don't have anything against Blurt (apart from disagreement with a few small details (no downvotes, pretty centralized governance)), and I never tried to attack it.

Remember the days when you found the exploit in the Minnowbooster withdrawals and drained the fund, fun times! Nice to see you develop morals since then.

I precisely remember voicing concerns about your #HBDPotato initiative for this reason..

  • I was worried it would or at least could be used for something other than your stated purpose.

I'd like to see what you are doing with #Blurt, #DLease and the other #BuildTeam projects, but keeping the 200,000 HP that you said you would NOT derive monetary value you from, is a crime IMO 😔

lolz I mean, no.

Somehow I can't see any crime arising from his choice to do exactly as he stated with airdropped funds that he holds the key to.

He has done exactly as he said he would.

That's what he always does.

That's what makes him the damn finest partner I've had in any endeavor I've ever pursued.

Ummm, he said he would in no way profit from it, and is earning some $ from it every month now.

  • The DLease.io project is too.

I don't have anything against him personally, I just think he's be better off returning the HIVE + Steem or burning it, instead of using it

Posted via D.Buzz

I was going to start posting once a day to #Blurt via the @dbuzz account, but got cold feet after reading a post about @thecryptodrive Powering Up the HIVE he said was "intended to keep the HBD/SBD peg"

  • His record is not clean, so long as he keeps the #HIVE/STEEM imo

    Posted via D.Buzz

Maybe he did, maybe he didn't.

How about wblurt?

I never had anything to do with wBlurt, while its code was based on Wrapped Hive, it was modified by wehmoen and I never saw its final source code or had access to its server.

Someone was, probably @edicted.

Could always be some other asshole though.

Let's narrow my "scope of attack" list down to key items:

  • Death Threats from anon twitter citing another project I work on: Unsolved (due to timing, I'm inclined to think it's nothing to do with that project)
  • Wblurt hack: Unsolved
  • Block space attack: @edicted ?

See how I'm handling this now?

wait, you have evidence that edicted did it, or are you claiming that because he wrote it in the post as a joke in response to the reward for finding who did it?

Don't worry about it.
Some people don't know what false confessions are.

I don't trust anything he says.

There's kinda-maybe-sorta circumstantial evidence.

Pls allow me to amend the above to reflect my actual position.

i seen it as a joke about the reward. i seen it that way first time i read it with knowing that anything is even happening on blurt. so it was an informational post.

I do not know.

I do know he's claiming he did it though.

"I seen"

Midwest much?