lol, I'm not attacking blurt. I'm just saying blurt and HBD/SBD potato are completely separated projects, so funds shouldn't be used for something else just because blurt is attacked.
I don't have anything against Blurt (apart from disagreement with a few small details (no downvotes, pretty centralized governance)), and I never tried to attack it.
Remember the days when you found the exploit in the Minnowbooster withdrawals and drained the fund, fun times! Nice to see you develop morals since then.
I precisely remember voicing concerns about your #HBDPotato initiative for this reason..
I'd like to see what you are doing with #Blurt, #DLease and the other #BuildTeam projects, but keeping the 200,000 HP that you said you would NOT derive monetary value you from, is a crime IMO 😔
lolz I mean, no.
Somehow I can't see any crime arising from his choice to do exactly as he stated with airdropped funds that he holds the key to.
He has done exactly as he said he would.
That's what he always does.
That's what makes him the damn finest partner I've had in any endeavor I've ever pursued.
Ummm, he said he would in no way profit from it, and is earning some $ from it every month now.
I don't have anything against him personally, I just think he's be better off returning the HIVE + Steem or burning it, instead of using it
Posted via D.Buzz
I was going to start posting once a day to #Blurt via the @dbuzz account, but got cold feet after reading a post about @thecryptodrive Powering Up the HIVE he said was "intended to keep the HBD/SBD peg"
Posted via D.Buzz
Maybe he did, maybe he didn't.
How about wblurt?
I never had anything to do with wBlurt, while its code was based on Wrapped Hive, it was modified by wehmoen and I never saw its final source code or had access to its server.
So you did not attack wblurt?
No
Someone was, probably @edicted.
Could always be some other asshole though.
Let's narrow my "scope of attack" list down to key items:
See how I'm handling this now?
wait, you have evidence that edicted did it, or are you claiming that because he wrote it in the post as a joke in response to the reward for finding who did it?
Don't worry about it.
Some people don't know what false confessions are.
I don't trust anything he says.
There's kinda-maybe-sorta circumstantial evidence.
Pls allow me to amend the above to reflect my actual position.
i seen it as a joke about the reward. i seen it that way first time i read it with knowing that anything is even happening on blurt. so it was an informational post.
I do not know.
I do know he's claiming he did it though.
"I seen"
Midwest much?
sorry english is my 3 language so i don't understand the question.