Personally I find it very unfair that others publish crap and earn 100 times more than me, we must do something or force the curators to look more to the minorities.
I remember once seeing something like this in a post from a very successful user on Hive, but I don't think so, as everyone has a reason to be rewarded like this.
It is true that it is unfair that you don't get what you expect, but if you don't make an effort, how will you get results?
If you look at the weekly statistics of leofinance, you realize that those who top the list of most comments, most votes, most LEO bets, most delegations to leo.voter, are the ones who are rewarded the most, since they contribute a lot to leofinance.
The difference is to build a brand little by little, and see results in
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
There have been a lot of topics about Hive being unfair and people have talked about how user A earns more than user B, even though user B has a lot better content and whatever.. But it doesn't work like that.
Sure, we want quality content to some extent obviously, but as soon as you have an audience, you're likely to be rewarded something for literally everything you do. So, the main thing to focus on for people should be how to grow your audience.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Of course, that's why part of the engagement is based on creating interpersonal relationships with other users, since by commenting frequently on someone's posts, over time you create a connection that, who knows, can bring a lot of audience.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta