CBDC is not real.

The restrict act applies to one country and is also not real yet.

What point will you argue next?
That people aren't going to do drugs because it's illegal and they could go to prison for twenty years?
This entire line of thinking is dead on arrival.

CBDCs are also dead on arrival.
Nobody wants them except for the dozen people that control it.
It is untested tech with zero consensus across the board.
Retail bankers don't want it.
Corporations don't want it.
Other countries will not accept it.
It's a hot pile of garbage with zero extra utility compared to what we have.
The infrastructure does not exist and no one has a reason to allow it to flourish.
In the magic fairytale scenario where I'm wrong on all counts it will be implemented a decade from now.
So why are we speculating about it now.
This is not a now problem.
So many worse things need to happen first to pave the way.

You are under the impression that demand for an asset can be eliminated with threats and violence. When has this ever been the case? Did the war on drugs make drugs more valuable or less? The demand for crypto can not go down from here. All that can be reduced is the supply via the outlets it flows though.

But again you just reiterate that supply will be reduced by 100% with draconian internet controls. I do not live in this alternate reality where the war on drugs and the war against pirating IP had a 100% success rate. And even if I did: who gives a fuck? Such information is completely useless. Playing chess against a grandmaster with the realization that you have a 100% chance of losing the game is not helpful in any way. The end result can not change, only how we get there.