I wouldn't support AI content either.
Why would I?
I think it's funny that many assume the exact opposite because I wrote this.
Show me artificially generated content that has value and maybe I'll think about it.
I'll wait here.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Value is subjective. Discussion like this is valuable, AI can’t replicate, yet.
But what we don’t think adds value may be different for another individual. Who is it to judge?
If a photo that’s a click of a button more worth it than an AI generated picture of a topic of interact? Is it worth more because it’s done by a human vs. interpretation by AI?
What if it reaches the point when you can't distinguish what is AI-generated or what's not?. I think that we aren't too far from that.
Some days ago I read an article from a University teacher saying that the content that Chat-gpt was able to write was better than the 80% of his students. That's worrying, interestingly also this teacher asked methods to avoid cheating in careers with AI generated content, and the answer was to make exams and public expositions in class.
The guy I'm talking to you about it's no asshole. I can tell that.
You need ai generated human emotions to prevent the natural human over reaction when u touch an easily misinterpreted nerve.
I wonder which part of our caveman evolution this comes from. Change is risk. Why fix if not broke.
The ai issue is more touching at what it means to be human and creative. Hive solves this
You need ai generated human emotions to prevent the natural human over reaction when u touch an easily misinterpreted nerve.
I wonder which part of our caveman evolution this comes from. Change is risk. Why fix if not broke.
The ai issue is more touching at what it means to be human and creative. Hive solves this