You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Twitter Dilemma And Why It Cannot Compete With Web 3.0

in LeoFinance3 years ago

I don't think the problem is the downvoted, it's the abuse of power.

Either for upvotes or downvotes. If we did not had downvotes we could not prevent spam and abuse.

I do think that there should be better ways to appeal on Hive and this automatic downvotes affect the retention. But in some cases they are necessary to give a notification to curators.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Sort:  

There are ways to tweak the system.

We also have the ability to look at the tribes. Notice how LEO doesnt seem to have this issue. While people believe that Hive is the only asset on Hive of value, they will miss the entire forest.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

Leo there is no downvote... that's good, bad content can stay unrewarded and spam content can be removed... I hope Hive would look at the issue, abuse of downvote power is definitely a problem in Hive...

I agree... they should tweek it definitely because I am not the only one having this issue, there were a lot of others, where big account holders out of ego downvoted post.

I don't downvote posts unless its spam, if its bad content, I downvote really small amount, anyway I don't have much downvote power, and give that author a chance to correct etc...

Abuse of downvote power is a issue in Hive, I am glad if Leofinance is free from it!!

I hardly care about that downvote, but I don't want a downvote troll, and since 3 downvotes came from that account I was rather scared... anyway