Hive has been around since March 20, 2020. Let’s take a look how we are doing when it comes to burning HIVE.
The initial option that was built in for burning HIVE was the promote option. On the old chain there was a promote section tab, that was mainly not used by almost anyone. Now this tab is no longer on Hive.Blog so the initial idea for burning HIVE is not available now.
Peakd has developed their own model for promotion and burning HIVE and it seems that it is used a bit. Not on massive scale though, but yet a start.
Other options for burning HIVE are the cost for creating accounts and community (3HIVE). When creating proposals there is a tax in form of burning HIVE as well.
Finally, authors can set @null as beneficiary to their posts and burn Hive in that way.
We will be looking at:
- HIVE burned from transfers at null
- HIVE burned from @null as beneficiary
- HIVE burned from creating accounts
- HIVE burned by category
- Top accounts that burned HIVE
The period that we will be looking here is March 21, 2020 till November 9, 2021
Transfers to @null account
Here is a breakdown by date for HIVE transferred to null.
A total of 206k HIVE transferred to @null account in the period.
The largest burn from transfers to @null is from the @hbdpotato account with 191k HIVE burned. This was a left over from the previous project running for stabilizing the SBD. From the quick analysis on the other burns, who is transferring HIVE to null, most of these cases are Peakd promotions and proposals. There is a cost for making proposals. I’m not totally familiar with this but there is like 100 HIVE cost for proposal, and at other times 50 or even 25 HIVE. I guess it depends on the value of the proposal.
Setting @null as beneficiary
Another way for burning HIVE is setting @null as beneficiary. For the not so familiar what this means, it basically sent the rewards for that post to @null, burning them.
Here is the chart.
A total of 17k HIVE transferred to @null as beneficiary account.
This chart is pretty much random. Usually when some of the popular large stakeholders set @null as beneficiary, it creates some significant amounts sent to null from those rewards.
Note: For simplicity I have converted HBD and VEST rewards to HIVE, so the numbers of beneficiaries are approximate and not accurate.
HIVE Burned From Creating Accounts
Accounts can be created with resource credits, but they can also be created with paying a 3 HIVE fee. Here is the chart for the HIVE burned for creating accounts.
This is an interesting chart.
As we can see, starting from August the amount of HIVE burned for creating accounts has increased a lot on a daily level. Ona a few occasinos it has reached 60k per day, but overall it has been in the range of 10k to 50k HIVE daily.
This is mostly becouse of Splinterlands, that has an influx of new users and was creating accounts for them. A total of 2M HIVE was burned from account creation fees.
Total HIVE Burned Per Month
If we take a look at the monthly chart we have this.
As for the account creation fees, we can see a massive increase in the last few months. In September there was almost 800k HIVE burned. The spike in February 2021, with 200k burned is due to the @hbdpotato burn.
A total of 2.17M HIVE was burned in the period.
HIVE Burned By Category
Here is the share of what burend HIVE.
90% of the HIVE burned is from account creation fees thanks to Splinterlands. 9% is from transfers to @null, mostly because of the @hbdpotato transfer and only 1% is from @null as beneficiaries.
Top 15 Users That Burned HIVE In The period
Here is the table for top 15 users that burned HIVE in the period.
Splinterlands is absolutely dominant on the chart with 1.93M HIVE burned. Next is @hbdpotato with 191k. All the next accounts have small amounts of HIVE burned in the range of few hundreds to few thousands.
Creating accounts has always been the most costly operation on the blockchain. Users can create free accounts with enough HP staked and resource credits, but when the demand is to high the RC are not enough and accounts are created ith paying a fee. Splinterlands has experience this and they have been creating a lot of accounts and burning HIVE in the process. This has been the dominant way for burning HIVE in the last year.
All the best
@dalz
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Thanks to Team Splinterlands and the community
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
SL is pushing the whole chain up
Splinterlands is more popular than "Hive Blockchain" as a search term. Imagine Uniswap or some other DAPP being more searched than Ethereum. Here we already have that accomplished. !PIZZA
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Hive need couple of more DApps do the same what Splinterlands is doing.
Next 2-3 years are key.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
100% agreed. I have always pushed gaming as the easy gateway. @dbuzz and @spknetwork can be amazing places too. With all the censorship going on Twitter and the ability to post on to Twitter (I haven't used this feature myself) are great advantages for @dbuzz
!PIZZA
I was hoping to see some information on burned Hive in the conversion to HBD. This is the way I will be burning Hive as I cash out. Rather than buy HBD on the market, I plan on using the conversion feature before cashing out.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
Conversions remove Hive from supply but in theory that Hive is still in exsistance just in another form, HBD.... it can be converted back, meaning its not permanently removed from circulation, only converted.
Here is a post I did on conversions recently
https://peakd.com/hive-167922/@dalz/hbd-to-hive-conversions-are-up-or-how-much-more-hive-was-generated
thanks for telling me I have never used hive as promotion before so I will send some hive to null if I have some to spare
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
HIVE to HBD conversions is another burn (5% of the amount converted)
Not sure should we consider those as burns ... they can come back :)
I made post specificly on conversions.
https://peakd.com/hive-167922/@dalz/hbd-to-hive-conversions-are-up-or-how-much-more-hive-was-generated
The fee part can't come back.
Let's assume HIVE = $1
100 HIVE->95 HBD (5% fee deducted and burned)
95 HBD->95 HIVE (no fee in this direction)
5 HIVE burned.
If the price changes, the conversion rate can go up or down, and the HIVE supply with it, but the fee is forever.
That's right.
Posted Using LeoFinance Beta
True that!
I didn't know that HIVE is also burnt.
Yep it is :)
I think the cost of making a proposal depends on the proposal length. This change was introduced in one of the recent hardforks.
~~~ embed:1508846116455993345 twitter metadata:aGlyb19oaXZlfHxodHRwczovL3R3aXR0ZXIuY29tL2hpcm9faGl2ZS9zdGF0dXMvMTUwODg0NjExNjQ1NTk5MzM0NXw= ~~~
The rewards earned on this comment will go directly to the person sharing the post on Twitter as long as they are registered with @poshtoken. Sign up at https://hiveposh.com.
Very interesting article... !!!
PIZZA Holders sent $PIZZA tips in this post's comments:
@vimukthi(3/10) tipped @nathanmars.leo (x1)
Learn more at https://hive.pizza.
Great stats, dalz. Splinterlands still on the top haha.
I am wondering what is that hbdpotato account?
It was a DHF project that used DHF funds to buy and convert HBD, to help restore the peg at a time when HBD was chronically undervalued. Upon conclusion of the project the remaining funds were burned. @hbdstabilizer is a newer and more general implementation of a similar concept.
Oh I see now, thank you for explanation.
Congratulations @dalz! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):
Your next target is to reach 92000 upvotes.
You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP
Check out the last post from @hivebuzz: