You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Great AI Debate and Hive Watchers

in LeoFinance2 years ago

I do believe communities must do their own policing as we are still small enough to know our users and their writing standards. I suppose you could throw in the odd spelling error and tweak the grammar as well making it more believable. Lucky we are not in a bull market as can you imagine when all the milkers come back it will be hard to stop.

Sort:  

Yes, it will eventually take community policing, but as long as their is Hive involved there will be that side involved. One good thing, many of those who like to downvote also do not hold a lot of community tokens

I am not a fan of downvoting, but in the same breath if something is wrong then I have no problem with downvotes as long as it is justified. I curate the sports community and know the community very well so I can spot a problem a mile away and why I don't think AI will be a big issue there.

"...as long as their is Hive involved..."

And that is my entire point. That is the reason for all scams, spam, plagiarism, AI botting, bot nets, bid bots, autovoters, and why Steem got took over. It's why 99% of downvotes fly. It's why we have HW.

We can have a better community by separating free speech from financialization.

Loading...