Sort:  

let's be honest. that's still not completely true. let's take axie infinity for example, it was hacked by leveraging a vulnerability in the ronnin bridge. none of the users that lost money in that hack did anything wrong. There are always risks, and a lot of them exist beyond the end-users control.

Agreeable but here we are on hive blockchain not a bridge that involves variety of people linking through from one chain to another.

Losing your keys on hive is entirely on you, whatever happens must have been something done knowingly or unknowingly.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta

hive was originally forked from steemit because someone managed to figure out how to hack the whole chain. one big hostile takeover. granted this event caused hive to become way more secure, but thinking that risks don't exist is naive. There are always risks, the entire ecosystem of blockchain technologies is still very new. I do absolutely think hive is more secure than a lot of blockchains, but I'm unwilling to think of it as risk free. Also, there are a ton of bridges on hive, it would be impossible to move money into hive from any other chain without a bridged, and there would be no liquidity mining.

I absolutely agree, hive is secured but it's not over its head above a breach.
There's always a risk.

Posted Using LeoFinance Beta