Basically, the idea of quality content is eliminated in this section of Leofinance. Now, the only requirement is that it is applicable content.

I like the idea of applicable content. For one, its a more objective crtiteria for judging whether the content in question should exist in the platform or not. It's also easier to apply.

For example, looking at the post you quoted, at less than 100 words, a lot of readers could frown on that as being low quality content. It may not even pass the SBI requirement for an upvote. (Though someone should correct me on that if the rules have changed). But it for others, it could contain enough information to be useful. So, it must have "some" quality to it, right? Or maybe not?

Either way, judging that post based on a concept of "quality" is problematic because the very definition of quality differs for every person. By focusing on applicability over quality, its a good way to jump over that issue, without discouraging those who write really good long articles.

Second, by focusing on applicable content, like you mentioned, we are opening the platform to all sorts of content creators. From people who make infographics and charts, to those who like to share content, but not exactly produce them.

It also makes LeoFinance more well-rounded, since its not just about articles and blogs, but all kinds of content for crypto and finance.

Also, since there are lots of speculation on how this will be applied. I wonder how discovery will work. Will there be some form of "microblog feed" added to your own feed, or will you have to go to a separate interface?

Posted Using LeoFinance ^Beta