Your post is the appropriate response.
If the Dev team takes action that is centralised Ban Hammering.
If the community takes action (as a result of your post) then that is decentralised community self-regulation.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Not much action the community can take, you can't get the funds out of their hands and they don't post so you can't downvote them. Everyone wants decentralization until shit they don't like happens.
Hmm, it would have been easy to fake out, use smurfs, or whatever. I think we're missing parts of the story and I'm confused about what it might be. The post of that one guy is pathetic at best.
I don't think you are missing much at all. It's simple, there was easy money to be had in exchange for ethics. Easy decision for most people.
we should expect, and be ready on this kind of scenario. we, are nonetheless a decentralized network. we learn as we go.
This is the way.
This is the way.
Cool, agree!
The test of decentralization is whether or not the devs can do it unilaterally (ie. without a broader consensus mechanism), not just choosing not to.