Does YouTube Automation Actually Work? A 30-Day Experiment
The concept of YouTube automation has gained significant traction in recent years, with many claiming it can generate substantial income—upwards of $100,000 a month—simply by posting content like YouTube Shorts. However, an increasing number of voices caution against viewing it as a guaranteed pathway to wealth; instead, it often resembles a "get-rich-quick" scheme heavily marketed by online gurus selling courses. In light of this, one individual, who describes himself as “just a normal dude with a 9-to-5 job,” embarked on a 30-day experiment to understand the viability of YouTube automation and whether it could yield any monetary success.
The initial step of the experiment involved creating and uploading the first YouTube Short—a compilation of funny NBA clips from recent games. The preparation took around an hour and a half, primarily spent on channel customization and logo design. However, the creator anticipated that the process would quicken over time as he became familiar with video production.
With high hopes, the goal for the first video was modest: achieving 500 views. After 18 hours, the creator analyzed the analytics for his first short, noting 633 views and a solid average view duration of 18 seconds. Encouraged by the initial success and the gain of his first subscriber (a random viewer—not himself), he decided to continue posting daily.
As the days progressed, the creator reached day nine with eight videos uploaded. The views continued to climb, including a standout short featuring Tracy McGrady that garnered over 10,000 views and 1,000 likes. The experiment was trending positively, with the novice creator expressing satisfaction at how quickly momentum was building.
In the first week alone, he achieved approximately 25,000 views and 33 subscribers, leading him to set ambitious goals for the second week, including reaching 100 subscribers and 25,000 views on a single video.
However, the tide began to turn around the two-week mark. The creator felt a noticeable dip in motivation, facing issues with fresh content ideas. While the first wave of shorts performed impressively, the videos from the subsequent days began to stagnate—many barely surpassing 500 views. By day 19, his subscriber count had only marginally increased, and new uploads noticeably struggled to gain traction.
Despite solid audience retention metrics, many recent shorts seemingly hit a ceiling, failing to capitalize on the initially favorable algorithmic exposure. The fluctuation in views became perplexing, leaving the creator in a state of uncertainty about the future of his channel.
As the challenge neared its conclusion, the creator demonstrated his video production process, revealing his strategies for sourcing content and editing. He utilized YouTube and TikTok as resources for clips and sounds, enhancing his videos using editing software. His approach reflected a simple, process-driven method that aimed to streamline content creation.
Once the 30-day period came to an end, he compiled the results: a total of 49 subscribers, around 45,000 views across 19 videos, and 3,000–4,000 likes. However, the stark reality set in—most engagement occurred during the first week, while the second half of the experiment yielded minimal growth.
Reflecting on the entire experience, the creator concluded that while YouTube automation can be effective with dedication and effort, it isn't a guaranteed means to quick wealth. The experiment served as a reminder that results—especially in a creative space like YouTube—can be erratic and often fall short of expectations promoted by others.
Ultimately, he indicated that those looking to pursue YouTube automation should prepare for a longer journey, acknowledging that success may take more extended periods to materialize than commonly portrayed in online narratives. While monetization is achievable, it won't happen overnight and will require consistent effort and adjustments based on performance analytics.
Part 1/7:
Does YouTube Automation Actually Work? A 30-Day Experiment
The concept of YouTube automation has gained significant traction in recent years, with many claiming it can generate substantial income—upwards of $100,000 a month—simply by posting content like YouTube Shorts. However, an increasing number of voices caution against viewing it as a guaranteed pathway to wealth; instead, it often resembles a "get-rich-quick" scheme heavily marketed by online gurus selling courses. In light of this, one individual, who describes himself as “just a normal dude with a 9-to-5 job,” embarked on a 30-day experiment to understand the viability of YouTube automation and whether it could yield any monetary success.
The Experiment Begins
Part 2/7:
The initial step of the experiment involved creating and uploading the first YouTube Short—a compilation of funny NBA clips from recent games. The preparation took around an hour and a half, primarily spent on channel customization and logo design. However, the creator anticipated that the process would quicken over time as he became familiar with video production.
With high hopes, the goal for the first video was modest: achieving 500 views. After 18 hours, the creator analyzed the analytics for his first short, noting 633 views and a solid average view duration of 18 seconds. Encouraged by the initial success and the gain of his first subscriber (a random viewer—not himself), he decided to continue posting daily.
Early Success and Growth
Part 3/7:
As the days progressed, the creator reached day nine with eight videos uploaded. The views continued to climb, including a standout short featuring Tracy McGrady that garnered over 10,000 views and 1,000 likes. The experiment was trending positively, with the novice creator expressing satisfaction at how quickly momentum was building.
In the first week alone, he achieved approximately 25,000 views and 33 subscribers, leading him to set ambitious goals for the second week, including reaching 100 subscribers and 25,000 views on a single video.
Hurdles and Challenges
Part 4/7:
However, the tide began to turn around the two-week mark. The creator felt a noticeable dip in motivation, facing issues with fresh content ideas. While the first wave of shorts performed impressively, the videos from the subsequent days began to stagnate—many barely surpassing 500 views. By day 19, his subscriber count had only marginally increased, and new uploads noticeably struggled to gain traction.
Despite solid audience retention metrics, many recent shorts seemingly hit a ceiling, failing to capitalize on the initially favorable algorithmic exposure. The fluctuation in views became perplexing, leaving the creator in a state of uncertainty about the future of his channel.
Lessons from the Final Days
Part 5/7:
As the challenge neared its conclusion, the creator demonstrated his video production process, revealing his strategies for sourcing content and editing. He utilized YouTube and TikTok as resources for clips and sounds, enhancing his videos using editing software. His approach reflected a simple, process-driven method that aimed to streamline content creation.
Once the 30-day period came to an end, he compiled the results: a total of 49 subscribers, around 45,000 views across 19 videos, and 3,000–4,000 likes. However, the stark reality set in—most engagement occurred during the first week, while the second half of the experiment yielded minimal growth.
Conclusion: Reality Behind YouTube Automation
Part 6/7:
Reflecting on the entire experience, the creator concluded that while YouTube automation can be effective with dedication and effort, it isn't a guaranteed means to quick wealth. The experiment served as a reminder that results—especially in a creative space like YouTube—can be erratic and often fall short of expectations promoted by others.
Ultimately, he indicated that those looking to pursue YouTube automation should prepare for a longer journey, acknowledging that success may take more extended periods to materialize than commonly portrayed in online narratives. While monetization is achievable, it won't happen overnight and will require consistent effort and adjustments based on performance analytics.
Part 7/7:
The simple takeaway? YouTube automation can work if embraced as a serious endeavor rather than a quick fix for financial success.