Part 8/11:
This legislation has sparked fierce debate, with supporters viewing it as a necessary safeguard to protect children from irreversible and barbaric procedures. Critics, typically citing the so-called "transgender community," condemned the bill as cruel and unjust, accusing it of denying gender-affirming care. However, voices in the conservative camp argue that the bill is about protecting innocence and preventing barbaric mutilation of children, asserting that allowing such procedures is a form of societal cruelty.