Part 9/10:

Yet, the speaker maintains a nuanced view: animals' actions—like licking or cuddling—are more about instinct and attachment rather than an understanding of love rooted in moral or rational consciousness. They compare human love to higher mathematics, noting that animals may operate on a simple algebraic level, whereas humans engage in complex calculus—symbolizing the depth and moral complexity of human relationships.

Conclusion: Recognizing the Depths and Limitations

While some believe animals are incapable of love as humans understand it, the stories and behaviors of animals like Hachikō or dogs in fires exemplify a form of loyalty and affection that is undeniably profound. Yet, the philosophical perspective that animals lack the higher faculties for love remains compelling for others.