Part 5/10:

The University of Michigan’s response appears measured. Officially, they condemn the unacceptable nature of the misconduct but seem more cautious about acknowledging the full extent of the coach’s personal failings. Notably, the university likely was aware of his extramarital affairs—these are often overlooked during hiring and tenure—yet the allegations of stalking and breaking into a home are new and serious.

The athletic department’s leadership is now conducting investigations, scrutinizing how they handled previous violations and missteps. Questions arise: Did they follow proper procedures? Were there warning signs ignored? The focus shifts towards accountability on the administrative level, searching for systemic flaws or lapses that enabled or overlooked these behaviors.