Part 5/10:
Lucas's attempt at reconciliation reflected a broader dilemma in the age of social media. His apology, posted publicly, was seen as a sign of weakness or capitulation. Many argued that if he truly believed his joke was harmless, he should not have apologized at all. Conversely, if he feared threats or harm to his family, the apology may have been a strategic move rather than an authentic expression of regret.
Experts and commentators debated whether apologies made under duress—such as threats—are meaningful or just performative. Some pointed out that social media and cancel culture foster a performative environment where sincerity is often sacrificed for appeasement or self-preservation.