Part 3/15:
The hosts acknowledge Weinstein's guilt but criticize the judicial decision, arguing that it undermines survivor accountability and the pursuit of justice, especially for sexual assault victims. They highlight issues around the use of prior bad acts evidence—sometimes used to tarnish a defendant's character—and whether they should even be admissible. Critics argue that such testimonies tend to muddy cases rather than clarify facts.
The discussion touches on broader themes of systemic bias, especially in how elite figures like Weinstein have long evaded consequences, and the inconsistent application of justice, with some believing Weinstein is guilty but others suggesting the legal process remains flawed.