Part 9/10:
An important aspect of understanding Trump’s tariff stance is to recognize the distinction between threatening and implementing measures. While he is serious about the problems he identifies, many of the threats are used as bargaining chips or negotiation tactics. For instance:
Proposed tariffs might serve more as warnings than immediate policy, with actual implementation contingent on foreign responses.
The language can be provocative but strategically designed to push for concessions.
This tactical ambiguity complicates international responses and requires careful navigation by global trading partners.