Part 6/14:
Illustrative cases include a woman with Catholic imagery questioned over her religious symbols or a 12-year-old boy accused of extreme far-right views over innocuous social media activity and a toy crossbow. These incidents demonstrate how absurd and intrusive police interference has become, often based on nothing more than perceived enthusiasm or beliefs.
The speaker emphasizes that even after legal victories, authorities continue to treat citizens as potential threats, effectively maintaining a surveillance state that monitors thoughts and speech rather than actions.