Part 8/9:
GM’s approach: simplicity, cost-effectiveness, reliability in moderate conditions, reliant on gravity and oil movement.
Tesla’s approach: complexity, precision, higher upfront costs, optimized for maximum efficiency and performance, especially in extreme conditions.
For consumers and industry observers, the takeaway is clear: Tesla’s system offers superior long-term performance, especially in demanding environments, but at a higher manufacturing cost. GM’s method provides a viable, economical alternative suitable for mass-market vehicles where cost savings are paramount.