Part 8/10:

Barr stated that the urgency and implications of national security must inform judicial processes in cases involving non-citizens. He emphasized that full adversarial processes to evaluate every individual case would not only overwhelm the judiciary but also disrupt swift compliance with necessary deportation protocols.

Judicial Insights and Critiques

Amidst this legal discourse, Barr responded to critiques levied by judges, such as comments made by Judge Millette regarding the treatment of detained Venezuelans. Barr refuted claims suggesting that Nazis received better treatment under the Alien Enemy Act, asserting that historical precedents do not justify such comparisons, and that past detainees often did not experience extensive judicial processes.