You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2024-12-27 09:16

in LeoFinance6 days ago

Part 2/8:

The proposal during the last administration involved the U.S. covering Denmark's extensive costs associated with Greenland, while both nations would share revenue from any energy or mining developments. This framework could benefit both parties, particularly as Denmark struggles to meet NATO spending commitments.

While Denmark likely does not see itself as under direct threat from China, the CCP's economic expansion is evident. Their approach involves investing significantly to gain influence, raising concerns about sovereignty in regions as critical as the Arctic. Given the current geopolitical climate, enhanced U.S. presence in Greenland could provide a protective barrier and optimize economic growth within the hemisphere.

The Panama Canal and U.S. Interests