Part 5/7:

An interesting aspect of the counterargument revolves around how we utilize resources. Critics of Maher’s perspective argue that resources are not finite simply because they are currently in use. Rather, many materials, such as steel, continue to exist and can be repurposed or substituted.

The shift towards electric vehicles has led to concerns about lithium scarcity; however, critics suggest that future technological advancements may present alternative solutions. Sodium batteries are being explored as an alternative to lithium, highlighting the unpredictability of technological innovation and resource discovery. This concept extends beyond batteries, involving the notion of economic substitution.