Part 2/4:
The crux of this position is the intention to enhance operational readiness without causing collateral damage to civilian populations or critical infrastructure. The objective is distinctly outlined: to strike at military goals that serve as bases for operations against the nation’s security, rather than indiscriminately affecting civilian life.
This statement underscores an essential deviation from prior strategies that may have restricted military action to avoid escalation. By redefining the engagement parameters to focus explicitly on military objectives, legislators argue that it empowers allied forces to act effectively while minimizing risk to innocents.