Part 4/9:
The question of who is at fault in this situation has split opinions. Some argue that both Leila and Dudu have acted inappropriately. Dudu's response was viewed by many as needlessly disrespectful, diminishing the opportunity for a more controlled reaction. On the other hand, Leila's public criticism seemed overly harsh and ill-timed for a player with such a long-standing relationship and reputation at the club.
In a commentary reflecting on this matter, one pundit highlights a commonly shared sentiment among football fans: "In a house where there is no bread, everyone fights, and no one is right." Such statements underline the notion that both parties have succumbed to their emotions rather than seeking amicable resolutions.