Part 4/10:
The split between the current and former administrations highlights a fundamental disagreement regarding financial strategy. While the previous leadership believed that leveraging the cativas sale was a sound financial maneuver to recover investments, the current leadership argues for a more measured approach. The new management posits that the project lacked proper pricing mechanisms and that the absence of a completed stadium complicates the decision.
This narrative raises a critical point about the efficacy of financial planning within the club. As both management teams have left their mark, the current administration must now grapple with delivering on operational and infrastructural promises amidst fluctuating revenue expectations.