Part 7/9:
A notable critique of traditional journalism centered on the concept of professionals who appear to advocate for democracy and freedom of speech while simultaneously endorsing censorship mechanisms when such speech contradicts their narratives. This hypocrisy drew ire, with calls for more accountability from mainstream journalists.
Questions were raised about what constitutes credible journalism, especially regarding how specialists are chosen and touted by media outlets. A system that relies on “experts” without rigorous vetting opens the door to misinformation and can lead to biased reporting. The essential principle of journalism—fact-checking and presenting unbiased news—has come under scrutiny, especially in light of recent events surrounding Zuckerberg’s remarks.