Part 4/10:
James candidly acknowledges the discontent among followers, describing how the term "grifter" is often used disparagingly towards figures who appear to exploit their audiences. He feels this label does not apply to him since he genuinely uses the product he is promoting. His open conflict arises from the realization that to some, profit-driven motives overshadow his authentic drive to create valuable offerings.
Engagement with his audience has always been a cornerstone of his strategy. The criticism he faces can be demoralizing, yet he chooses to frame it as an opportunity for reflection and growth, prompting larger discussions about integrity in the influencer space.