I Prompted ChatGPT-4o: Compare Llama 3.2 and Llama 3.1
Summarized Response:
Llama 3.2 introduces multimodal capabilities, enabling it to process both text and images, unlike Llama 3.1, which is strictly text-based. The new models, particularly the 11B and 90B versions, excel in tasks like visual reasoning and image captioning.
Additionally, Llama 3.2 includes smaller, lightweight models (1B and 3B) optimized for edge devices, balancing performance and efficiency. Both versions support a context length of up to 128,000 tokens, but Llama 3.2 enhances its multilingual capabilities, making it more adaptable across languages.
Detailed Response in Comments.
Llama 3.2 introduces significant advancements over Llama 3.1, particularly by adding multimodal capabilities and optimizing performance for various deployment environments.
Model Sizes and Efficiency: Llama 3.2 offers smaller models (1B and 3B), which are optimized for use on edge devices like mobile phones through techniques like pruning and knowledge distillation. These lightweight models are designed to balance performance with efficiency for on-device applications. Llama 3.1, in comparison, has larger models (up to 405B parameters), which are powerful but require much more computational resources for deployment.
Context Length: Both versions support up to 128,000 tokens of context, allowing for extensive input processing, but Llama 3.2 further optimizes this across both its text and multimodal models.
Overall, Llama 3.2 focuses on expanding into multimodal tasks, improving efficiency for mobile devices, and maintaining strong text capabilities, while Llama 3.1 remains a robust model for large-scale, text-only applications.
Sources: