I think it's the sort of thing that should be discussed. Those looking in (without the option to ignore) would be seeing a lot of spammy comments, but I think if we can manage with a single line of text, distributed tokens, and a nudge-vote it might not be so bad.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If the bot was smarter, it could send the message once, which could sit nicely at the bottom of the comment section, then if other tokens are handed out, and the bot detects that message as sent, it wouldn't need to send another one. Maybe it could be smart enough to update the original message with more stats as more tokens get handed out, instead of a new message each time. I realize that might be tough to pull off...
True.
One comment at the bottom of a post that updates with the list of people earning the token on the post/comments within, I like it.
Should probably learn how to do this myself eh :)
Yeah. That's a language I haven't spoken since Qbasic.
Just an ongoing tally of who sent what all in one message. I say bottom because I'd most likely upvote the real comments a little bit to boost curation rewards (I'd love to switch that name to 'consumer rewards' but that's a story for another day).
I've been dabbling for a long time, never learnt one in an out though, even English :)
Consumer awards makes more sense, those who I speak to in the outside would might not glaze over so fast.
How Steem/Hive hasn't sold this message to the world yet I am not sure.