Many European countries did not support such an international document, because it is absolutely natural that Nazism and similar concepts are purely subjective concepts. That is, who is considered a Nazi, who is called a fascist, as a rule, depends on the point of view of the speaker.

The Nuremberg Trials, the guilty, were Nazi.

The Assembly then adopted the draft resolution, "Combatting glorification of Nazism, neo-Nazism, and other practices that contribute to fuelling contemporary forms of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, and related intolerance."

The UNGA expressed deep concern about the glorification of the Nazi movement, neo-Nazism, and former members of the Waffen SS organization - the military branch of the Nazi party - including the erection of monuments and memorials, holding public demonstrations to glorify the Nazi past, movement, or neo-Nazism.

The Assembly also expressed its disapproval of any attempts to glorify those who fought against the anti-Hitler coalition, collaborated with the Nazi movement, and committed war crimes and crimes against humanity.

There is absolutely nothing subjective about glorifying Nazi. We know who the Nazi were, we know what the Nazi wore and what the Nazi thought, none of that is subjective, because we have the documented evidence. War Crimes, Crimes against humanity, not Subjective either. Its very easy to condemn any and all such inclination and its abhorrent to suggest that glorification of such things, or the figures themselves or their crimes, are Subjective, are a matter of opinion, as if someone being a Nazi is up for debate, as if we hadn't the Nuremberg Trials, as if its not established and understood.