Looks like we finally have an answer to whether men with big guns overcompensate for a small package, thanks to a study published a few days ago in the American Journal of Menβs Health. π
In this study, we formally examine the association between penis size dissatisfaction and gun ownership in America. The primary hypothesis, derived from the psychosexual theory of gun ownership, asserts that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises will be more likely to personally own guns.
Now I won't go into the methodology and all that boring stuff, the paper is open for anyone who wants to indulge on the semantics. Plus I only skimmed the paper as I really don't care about the subject.
Instead I will concentrate on the two points I found really interesting.
Of course one is the main finding, which according to the paper it's the exact opposite of the primary hypothesis. That it's the men who are less satisfied with their size that are actually LESS likely to own a gun!
We find that men who are more dissatisfied with the size of their penises are less likely to personally own guns across outcomes, including any gun ownership, military-style rifle ownership, and total number of guns owned
But now comes the really juicy and hillarious part!
If you scroll down all the way to the funding of the study you will find this
The data collection for this study was supported by funding from Change The Ref, an organization that βuses urban art and nonviolent creative confrontation to expose the disastrous effects of the mass shooting pandemic.β Although Change The Ref holds a clear political stance with respect to the role of guns in society, this organization played no part in the planning or implementation of the study.
It looks like the study was funded by a anti-gun organization, probably in the hopes that they have something scientific to back up their media or whatever
But unfortunately for them, it totally backfired ππππππππ
If you want to read the paper just click here, it's open for everyone.
As I said I only skimmed the article so I don't really have an opinion on how good the "science" behind it is. I just found it hillarious how an anti-gun group tried to fund a paper to use for their propaganda only to back fire 100 %. π
Posted Using InLeo Alpha
I am perfectly happy with the size of my manhood and my guns, lol. So that study is bullshit, haha. Actually I am not as satisfied with my guns, I do need a bigger rifle for longer range deer hunting, which could double as a sniper rifle, lol...
Lol, read the main finding (second quote) again. Slowly.
I confused the main finding with the primary I guess... LOL...
Now they need to do a study about guys with little dicks driving big trucks, lol. That's the real compensator, at least in the southeastern US, lol. Bigger the truck, the smaller the dick, lol.
Lmfaaaaaao!! I'm dead ππ
Thank God I've no GUNS of any Size but actually ancestors used to carry big ones for hunting. ππ
That last part is literally a plot twist I didn't expected at all. !LOLZ
lolztoken.com
Cause they're always Kraken
Credit: reddit
@trumpman, I sent you an $LOLZ on behalf of idksamad78699
(1/4)
Clearly there is some conflict of interest lol! But it was fun to see about the possibility of a research like that π€£
Got big guns, and a big πβ¦..
Thanks for the confirmationβ¦.
Liar!
!pimp
You must be killin' it out here!
@silverd510 just slapped you with 5.000 PIMP, @trumpman.
You earned 5.000 PIMP for the strong hand.
They're getting a workout and slapped 2/3 possible people today.
Read about some PIMP Shit or Look for the PIMP District
!pimp π
You must be killin' it out here!
@trumpman just slapped you with 1.000 PIMP, @silverd510.
You earned 1.000 PIMP for the strong hand.
They're getting a workout and slapped 1/3 possible people today.
Read about some PIMP Shit or Look for the PIMP District
There's only one thing a gun can compensate for... it's lack of a gun.
Lmao
Satisfaction or dissatisfaction with a body part plays no role in the outcome of a violent conflict... but gun ownership does.
!hiqvote
You received an upvote of 80% from Precious the Silver Mermaid!
Please remember to contribute great content to the #SilverGoldStackers tag to create another Precious Gem.
@trumpman, the HiQ Smart Bot has recognized your request (2/3) and will start the voting trail.
In addition, @trumpman gets !PIZZA from @hiq.redaktion.
For further questions, check out https://hiq-hive.com or join our Discord. And don't forget to vote HiQs fucking Witness! π»
Absolutely hilarious π, I do not know if the subject is a riddle or an irony, but thinking straight about it, i think the study trying to point out that, man's with small cock gets angry easily, it's really interesting on what point the study was trying to proved.
Wow, that's some serious twist right there big brother π It's funny how things turn out sometimes. But hey, at least it adds some spice to the ongoing debate. Perfect picture, but yep it totally backfired on themππππ
It sounds like an interesting paper. I'll put it on the side and read it later if I have time. I am a bit surprised but after thinking about it, I don't think the size matters when you want a gun or not. I think it is dependent on their own view of things.
They wasted their time and money, idiots!
!BBH