i would definitely try this out. what i am concerned is how nutritious it really easy compared to the "real" chicken. From what they say, for example in supermeat's site it is, but what they would say? :P
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm not sure about Singapore, but when they apply in Europe nutritional values will have to be disclosed on the packaging.
That's not to say that in the US the standard is very high with their chlorinated chicken. Outside of EU (and UK) food standards are generally rather low and products made from plant-based nutrients can't be much worse so to say. Altho there's more work for balanced diets.
Also keep in mind this "chicken" was never (preventively) treated with antibiotics or any other drugs. Contrary to most chicken sold.
!ENGAGE 20
true! what i mean is if we know any studies that show or compare the nutritional value between a standard chicken, a biological or this one
No, obviously not since these are absolutely new products. Supermeat (Israel) is even not yet licensed.
As such it would be difficult to have objective studies since the researchers couldn't yet purchase the product and would have to rely on the manufacturer or the manufacturer would even have to commission the study.
I'm pretty sure tho that, unless you're a health nut, there's plenty of studies highlighting how bad a lot of the food you currently eat is. :3
haha i know that :P it's just out of curiosity for the sake of comparing :P
ENGAGEtokens.