The Majority Of Type 1 Child Rape Offenders Are MUSLIM!

Faima Bakar is a Metro "journalist" who lies by omission. Faima - The Majority Of Type 1 Child Rape Offenders Are MUSLIM!

Not Diverse - Perverse

Generally, those who are ideologically left-wing, Muslim, or both, typically downplay the extent and the causation for the majority of child rape gangs here in the UK. The very term "grooming gang" is a descriptive softening of an inescapable fact, grooming gangs are "child-rape gangs", organised cells of child molesting perverts, child rapists who prey on the young and most vulnerable in our society.

Due to the activism of Tommy Robinson and others, the elephant in the room has been revealed to all. The UK media have been forced to report on the ethnicity of "type 1" child rapists, there has been little to no reporting on the "religion" of these offenders. However, one only needs to look at the "names of offenders" to determine whether or not they come from a "Muslim background".

Christians generally tend to have Christian names, Muslims usually tend to have Islamic names. There is no rocket science to understanding and accepting this methodology; it easily cuts through the disingenuous tripe of the invertebrate PC gutter press.

The press has repeatedly framed their stories of "grooming gang offenders" being predominantly "ASIAN". That may be true, but the implications of their absurd generalisation implicates all ASIANS. This false narrative MUST be corrected. Press reports of grooming gang offenders don't seem to feature people from China, or Japan or Taiwan or Cambodia, they tend not to have names that identify with Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh or Shinto beliefs (in the main).

What we do know is that the majority of convicted "type 1 offenders" are "ASIANS" of "PAKISTANI" heritage, offenders who also happen to have Islamic names. There are, of course, some Middle Eastern and North Africans implicated in child rape gangs; they too have in the main - Islamic names!

Type 1 Child Rapists

"Journalists" on the ideological left have gone to great lengths to hide, obfuscate and disguise a genuine and disturbing fact - the majority of organised gang-raping child molesters are PAKISTANI and MUSLIM. One such "journalist" is the Metro's Faima Bakar, a virtue-signalling left-wing ideologue. Faima is a disingenuous and deeply flawed individual who has deliberately sought to downplay Muslim gangs that rape, molest, beat, abuse and pimp out vulnerable young children to "clients in their community" who are also family members.

Faima Bakar - The Metro's Virtue Signalling "Journalist"

Faima makes an absurd claim in her "ubiquitous journalistic reporting" for the Metro. Faima claims there is no "Muslim problem with sexual grooming" in her obfuscated opinion piece. It is a whitewash of facts, an obfuscation of reality, a distortion, a necessary distraction, an out and out lie. Famia's fantastical fantasy adventure into journalism makes for fallacious and ideologically driven reading - it is propaganda.

In her article, she states:

"Almost 85 per cent of offenders found guilty of sexual activity with a minor in England and Wales in 2011 were white while four per cent were Asian".

While that may be true, there are a couple of points to pick up on and robustly refute. First of all, her statistics are from 2011, how many more "type 1 grooming gang offenders" have been revealed since 2011? Are there any more recent statistics out there that she could have used? Secondly, Faima conflates "type 1" offenders with "type 2" offenders; this is an essential and necessary point to make, conflating these two types of abuse will "dilute" the figures and create a "more palatable" narrative.

Feminist Fallacies

"Type 1" child-raping group abuse involves targeting a victim, or victims, based on their vulnerability.

"Type 2" group abusers are defined as having "a longstanding sexual interest in children".

The CEOP (The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command) is part of the UK's National Crime Agency. The CEOP is tasked to deal with and report on child sexual abuse. They produced a report in 2013, Faima didn't use the statistical evidence in that CEOP report.

Why?

We are going out on a limb here but perhaps here's why.

The CEOP study reported fifty-seven cases of "type 1" abuse, Police forces in the UK provided "ethnicity data" for fifty-one of those cases. The report makes for a shocking read.

Seventy-five per cent of recorded Type 1 group abusers, who target victims based on their vulnerability, were Asian.

The Office for National Statistics estimates that 7.5 per cent of the UK's population are Asian. Seventeen per cent of "Type 1" offenders were white, compared to 86 per cent of the UK population.

The CEOP study also found that:

"Type 1" groups tend to be larger: the majority involve groups of four abusers, compared to Type 2 abusers, who tend to act in pairs. That means in terms of raw figures, there are more Asian men carrying out group abuse than white men (229 compared to 70).

Those statistics identifying "type 1" and "type 2" abusers were published in 2012. Faima did not use those statistics in her article. The Quilliam Foundation, an anti-extremist think tank run by Muslims, published a report of their own in December 2017, they found:

"....that 84% of 'grooming gang' offenders were (South) Asian, while they only make up 7% of total UK population and that the majority of these offenders are of Pakistani origin with Muslim heritage".

Faima decided not to use those "statistics" in her article either?

Why not Faima?

Was it to distort, distract and paint a narrative that suits your ideological goals? Faima could have reached out to Ella Hill or Sammy Woodhouse if she wanted to hear their stories? How Pakistani Muslim men abused them, and how their abusers were religiously and racially motivated when carrying out the abuse?

Instead, all we get to read in Faima's article are old statistics, and another manufactured left-wing virtue signalling narrative. Faima projects a form of cultural relativism that is prevalent on the left. Rather than attacking people (including victims of Muslim rape gangs) for being "Islamophobic" or "racist", why not report the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth Faima, why be so selective?

A real journalist would not hide behind outdated statistics. A real journalist would not conflate "type 1" abusers with "type 2" abusers. Faima's opinion piece in the Metro is profoundly flawed and ignorant. It deceives by omitting facts and thus, appears to be driven by ideological biases.

Downplaying the nationality and religion of "type 1 child-raping offenders" is not only disingenuous, disturbing and disgusting, but it also highlights the reason why abusers got away with raping vulnerable children in the UK for decades. Famia you need to realise that it's not racist to report on something real, disproportional and relative to a particular culture, religion and community.

These Muslim child-rape gangs deserve all our condemnation for the crimes they commit, but let's not frame this as an intrinsically Islamophobic and racist problem, let's not prostrate ourselves to political correctness. Faima please "stop bleating" about islamophobia. Informed people are not buying what you are selling any more.

You can read Famia's article by clicking HERE.

---

Posted from TR.News with SteemPress : https://www.tr.news/the-majority-of-type-1-child-rape-offenders-are-muslim/

---