Steem is dead as almost noone outside China wants quasi decentralised bit practically centralised social network. Blurt did good move by deleting negative votes, therefore whales cannot "cancel" small players.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
In my opinion to delete flags completely encourages plagiarism and farming.
The problem of HIVE is that a big part of the downvotes are retaliation, "I don't like your opinion" or "I won't allow you to upvote comments [or anything else] while I myself am a whale and can do automated curation sniping as well as publishing one shit post every day without getting punished."
STEEM is dead apart from the great but very small DU (Deutsch Unplugged) communty of @chriddi. :)
Hive is going on the way like Blog yahoo360. They setup base on decentralized system but they create more power for whale-hiver and abuse its. that seems i had more money so more power
How can you think there wouldn't be other ways to create a social network than it's done here on HIVE, where an oligarchy of early miners and former bid bot owners (plus some HIVE chillers) dominate a centralized platform?
There are interesting ideas ... read for example here.
Cardano and Solana also have big communities which are valuable as well. Cardano is far less centralized than HIVE.
HIVE is partly just toxic. Top witnesses delegate their stakes to each other and their sock puppet accounts, borrow each other their posting keys to hide their actions, vote each other for witnesses and mutually support their proposals ...
I should add that also Splinterlands is far more decentralized than HIVE itself, with many different stake holders (who really bought their stakes), and I really hope that either the Splinterlands community will get more and more influence on this platform or just fork in future.