us artists tends to copy works that can add beauty to the painting, and i really don't see anything wrong with this one, there are so many artists that use other artist artwork, take dadaism as an example, or the one spintwister commented about appropriation art but since jaguar is a scandalous impulsive person who doesn't warn first or consult the artist to just correct what went wrong now this artwork has become a bad view to the other viewers, art is very broad you see..
lets say if i am the kind of artist who uses other artworks and add scriblless and paints on it and my main purpose is to gather the negative or positive reactions to my viewers which can be considered as interactive art and put that reason in my artists statement that can be considered as an art as long as the artist knows how to stand for it. this case can be dealt with by just talking to the artist by advicing to credit, its not too much to ask really but jaguar just wants to bully people for pleasure or i think the person is very thirsty for attention which is very sad really..

Posted using Dapplr