History or should I call it trash?

History is such a thing which will exist all the time as there exists the past. Nobody can erase the history; it doesn't matter if anyone tries hard to erase it. Somehow, some people write about incidents in books or share their thoughts with others, and in that way, incidents passed from one generation to another.

ImgSrc

History is the thing that reminds us about our ancestor's mistakes and consequences. As an example, we can check the reference to World War II, and from that history, right now most of the countries don't want a war. It's a lesson for most of countries, and for that, those countries don't want to repeat it. But again, I think every country has nothing to do with history unless history is on those countries side. That's the reason there are some countries still at war. I think it's good because it's helping many countries not to go to war.

I know that many things can be changed, but the nature of humans in a country or region changes hardly. So the history of a region or country is very effective when some kind of collaboration occurs. It's like trading in my eyes. We can make technical analyses based on the historical data. History repeats itself again and again, but that doesn't mean nothing new won't happen. As an example, you can see the price of Bitcoin now, and in history, the price of Bitcoin was never so high. It's a new thing that happened. So, history can help to predict about those things.

There are tons of benefits of history, and I agree with it. But at the same time, history is the most boring subject for a student. More specifically, stories represent in front of us in boring ways, and I feel it's not necessary to know all kinds of history. Based on the person, the interest is different, and the eagerness to know about the kind of history can be different. Supported, I am interested in science-related history, and I love to learn more and more about it. Similarly, some people love to know about the history related to politics, literature, or something else. If someone forces me to know the history of literature, I don't think it's interesting.

The history is very important from various aspects, but when it comes to academic cases, I think it's a totally pointless and useless idea. Restaurants need to take a lot of stress for the remaining subjects, and reading about history is nothing more than a burden in my opinion. Secondly, I want to know what the benefit of history is from an individual perspective. I am taking myself as an example.

I am a student of science, and I completed my graduation from the fisheries department. In the future, I may do a job, business, or something else, but I don't see any necessity of history. I completed my graduation, and I never felt I needed the history lesson anytime. Secondly, we are living in a digital world, and whenever we need to know about any history, we can easily search it on Google, and there is tons of data for it. Why should I need to bother myself to know something when I am not so interested?

Again, as a general person, I want to make money, and for making money, what's the necessity of a history lesson? As a general person, I won't suffer at a loss if I don't know about politics, literature, or the history of science. I believe that history is totally unless it's related to us personally. And the recent generation does not depend on nonsense history, and they don't care about it. I think practical, and I feel we should focus on practical knowledge rather than nonsense history. Again, I want to say that history can be biased also. In fact, there are many histories already of such a thing.

History has advantages and disadvantages; I didn't mention any disadvantages here. History in this digital world is trash in my eyes. So I think the history subject can be introduced in academics, but it should not be a compulsory subject, and there will be no exams on it.