How will the 5 deal with dissent among themselves in the event of a 3-2 split for changes to governance or over a solution to a community issue.
The idea would be the consensus, thinking about solutions until they reach one that the five agree on
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
ok so it would be full consensus or nothing. and how would those decisions be ratified by the community once theyve been settled on by the 5?
Yeah the consensus is critical. Especially if it could involve decision making on certain matters. It's more like a fail safe.