You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: POB TALK 11/07/2021 - #43

in Proof of Brain4 years ago (edited)

Hello. So, first time commenting here. I'm interested in feedback more than contest participation myself. What do you guys think about the first POB proposals introduced by @trostparadox? Like it? Hate it? Do you have any proposals of your own that you would like to see evaluated?

What do you think about the new POB front-end? Like it? Hate it? Let's please discuss.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Sort:  

RE:POB proposals

Leave me the possibility to cut off overrated, overvalued rewards (the place where circle-jerking appears), and I will vote "YES" for everything else. I hate BLURT, and don't want to see myself in another blurt-like place


Posted via proofofbrain.io

After a bit of back and forth with Marky, I have to write that I don't disagree with you. The stigma of the DV is incredible, however.

Initially, I think the approach was to remove the DV altogether or require consensus for all DV's. The problem there was that I would have had my legs cut out from under me when searching for plagiarism or other types of fraud.

I see now one flaw in the proposal. If YOU are also protecting the system via DV'ing over-rewards, then you and others must also have some sort of standard that should be defined in the proposal. For example:

  • Whale upvotes an article < 1 paragraph at 100%. Rewards are 100 POB
  • Multiple responses to whale gives no feedback. DV applied to reduce rewards.
  • Multiple whale votes now for same types of articles. DV's continuously applied.
  • Account is now...muted? Who knows. Currently there is no penalty outside the DV.

Questions we'd then need to ask is: how much is too much? What's an acceptable reward? We'd have to bring some objectivity to the subject, if that's even possible. Well, I think we can at least all see that if a post is barely a paragraph, the rewards shouldn't be that much.

Now, the proposal gives room for changes, but because DV for your area isn't defined that means you'd have to wait for a change. Any amount of time with your hands tied behind your back is too long.

I feel I'll also have to address the elephant in the room too before I can get some traction. I'll need to define both malicious upvoting AND downvoting - Christ, with verifiable examples too I guess. It's almost like I can't get to the next phase without addressing that topic.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

What are the changes in POB Front-end? I didn't see nothing bigger.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Oh. I mean the new POB-ecency front-end. Here: https://proofofbrain.blog/

I think it's still in development, but it's pretty nice in my opinion.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

Wow, I didn't know that POB-ecency was launched, thanks for that info and for your reply!!!


Posted via proofofbrain.io

It's very nice and cool. I am sure it will make POB more interesting and fun. Excited to see it go on main frontend soon😊


Posted via proofofbrain.io

I can vouch for some functionality. Posting comments on it works pretty smoothly.


Posted via proofofbrain.io

For me it os not really a bad idea but i think it needs to be thoroughly reviewd.


Posted via proofofbrain.io