I would give more if I could. Thanks for helping out.

Art. 1: 5 (five) people formed the council, to start designing decisions on the direction the community will take.

It's a reasonable number if people are dedicated to the task. I would imagine these people would be able to commit time online to evaluate and address concerns. I'll admit I don't know how much time that would be as this isn't an outside job. Your approach works with @trostparadox's recommendations.

Art. 2: The 5 members will not impose any rules, they will be a kind of council that will discuss issues of concern of the community, look for a solution and then present the community as an official statement from the community.

I think we'd have enough for one council. I'm not sure if it's possible for a rotation each time to have five new people from different countries. I kind of feel 2-6 are the same concept, but not identical. You have the primary rule which says we need 5 people each from a different country and then a list of exceptions to that rule.

Art 7-8

Similar concepts. They could be the same step with #8 as an exception.

No major issues. We'd hammer out any details and move on. I feel it works with the article trost posted today. Kind of goes hand-in-hand. I feel that we'd have to have some hard requirements in the beginning though. I don't know that we should change things so quickly unless there's a strong belief that something is wrong.