What an interesting reply. My father never told me that saying, but my military and civilian training certainly did. I work in the nuclear power production industry. I specialized in water chemistry and radiation protection, but I'm now working as a radiation engineer.
I enjoy the detail of presenting a problem with a solution as well. Honestly, there's no better way to go. From a project management standpoint, you'll rarely be denied funding with this approach. The second best option is to present the problem while seeking a solution. I've seen just as good resolutions coming from that position as well.
I never ceased to get amazed when I write these STEM articles. I'm all done writing about conventional, experimental, and theoretical power production. My next stem article will probably be on botanical power production or varying obscure nuclear power technologies.
I have to switch out topics now and again though to avoid getting stale in the presentation.
I guess I'll have to look at your old articles to see if you talk about thorium based reactors vs the conventional nuclear reactors. Perhaps you could write about how renewables like solar and wind are destroying the environment they are supposedly saving... :) Saw a TEDx talk on that not long ago-it was a push for nuclear-something I'm a fan of, and it makes sense...Looking forward to see what you write next.
I don't think I've gotten to Thorium yet, but I have the material available. However, I can certainly finish it after my next post on scientific victims. It would be my pleasure.
By the way, I just saw an article yesterday and thought about you because of this article on concrete...
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/combat-climate-change-researchers-want-to-pull-carbon-dioxide-from-ocean-and-turn-it-into-rock-180977903/#:~:text=Running%20seawater%20through%20an%20ocean,limestone%20on%20a%20grand%20scale&text=All%20of%20this%20excess%20carbon,are%20sensitive%20to%20the%20change.