100 POB? $30-90 ? Looks like a joke.
Why even to have these Art7 Art8 there ? Nothing but waste of space and time.
Make it more significant ( if you really think it is needed) , or ... remove these limitations completely
With the present unlimited, no-questions-asked solo powers of ONE SINGLE person ( the founder), I see it not even any reasons to talk about POB-fund.
Unless:
The POB fund is moved to a new, freshly created Hive account, with MULTI-SIGNATURE active private keys.
So only multi-sig signed transactions from this fund would be ever possibleKeys of this multi-sig fund will be in the hands of "council members"
I too think that the minimum of 100 POB should be raised or eliminated. I am leaning in favor of raised. This would help prevent users from another tribe moving en masse into POB and voting an individual with little stake into governance positions. POB can be acquired fairly rapidly with a few good posts and curation so a reasonable minimum stake to be involved in governance should not be an issue. We want those stepping into governance roles to be committed to the platform and community.
In my opinion this needs to continue to be discussed and the POB fund SHOULD be moved in order to continue to fund the platform, not sit liquid in one individuals wallet. Unless people make noise about it this wont be changed so discussing it is relevant and necessary.
I would already comment on POBfund as well. I had this same question regarding how it would be used.