I love this, music to my ears everytime discussions are going on.
The proposal idea is great and is quite what we already have. Turning the pob-fund account into multisign is also great.
I'd like to ask though, is there any difference between your ideas for proposal voting and what @proofofbrainio says in his last post that went like this:
More than 50% of stake must vote on "yes" or "no" to make the decision.
The major difference is it is all automated .
Right now @proofofbrainio has to calculate the 50% stake and all which might lead to some mistakes too ( human error can't be ignored ) but the ARCHON governance automates everything and calculates everything by itself .
Ok, this bit about automation is great.
But something isn't so clear. Is it that total votes (whether yes or no) must be up to 50% of Stake? Or is it that the individual options must have up to 50% votes to pass like 'yes' must have up to 50% stake votes to pass and 'no' must have up 50% stake votes to pass.
See
Ex: Let's say totally 100 accounts have staked 1000 POB .
So in order for the proposal to be valid 510 POB staked accounts must vote ( if this is only 2 accounts then also it will be valid )
Remember , here too the 50% is based on POB staked . So
Ex2: If 600 POB staked account have voted , then 300+ POB staked account should have voted for YES for the proposal to pass .